Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorObwatho, Simon Ph.D
dc.date.accessioned2026-07-01T09:25:39Z
dc.date.available2026-07-01T09:25:39Z
dc.date.issued2025-12-15
dc.identifier.issnhttps://doi.org/10.36228/MJ.19/2025.3
dc.identifier.otherhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-1347-6409
dc.identifier.urihttp://repository.anu.ac.ke/handle/123456789/1033
dc.description.abstractThis study examined the practices, experiences, and institutional support structures related to structured supervision planning within master’s degree programmes across selected African universities. Using a mixed-methods research design, data was collected from 362 respondents 214 master’s students and 148 supervisors through structured questionnaires featuring Likert-scale items and open-ended questions. Quantitative data were analyzed descriptively, while qualitative insights provided contextual depth on supervision dynamics. Findings show that both supervisors and students recognize structured supervision planning as essential for improving research progress, clarity of expectations, and overall thesis quality. Supervisors reported higher levels of engagement in co-developing supervision plans, clarifying deliverables, and encouraging student responsibility. Students affirmed the benefits but noted inconsistencies, particularly in their involvement in developing milestones and in the regular review of supervision plans. Institutional support was perceived as moderate, with existing policies insufficiently communicated, limited digital tools for supervision management, and minimal monitoring or accountability mechanisms. Comparative analysis revealed perceptual gaps between supervisors and students regarding collaboration, clarity, and institutional backing. Both groups agreed, however, that structured planning enhances motivation, confidence, and timely completion of research. The study concludes that while structured supervision planning is valued, its implementation remains uneven across institutions. The paper recommends strengthening institutional frameworks, providing targeted training for supervisors, adopting digital supervision management systems, and embedding structured planning within quality assurance processes. These interventions can enhance consistency, efficiency, and research outcomes, contributing to a more supportive and sustainable postgraduate supervision environment in African higher education.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherMind Journalen_US
dc.subjectStructured Supervision Planningen_US
dc.subjectPostgraduate Research Supervisionen_US
dc.subjectMaster’s Studentsen_US
dc.subjectResearch Supervisorsen_US
dc.subjectInstitutional Support Systemsen_US
dc.subjectResearch Management Practicesen_US
dc.subjectSupervision Roadmapsen_US
dc.subjectMonitoring and Review Processesen_US
dc.subjectSupervisor–Studenten_US
dc.titleStructured supervision planning in master’s research: exploring institutional practices and stakeholder experiences in African universities.en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record